Weekly Market Commentary - Midyear Outlook 2016: Campaigning for More Investment
We expect mid-single- digit returns for the S&P 500 in 2016, consistent with historical mid-to-late economic cycle performance, driven by a second half earnings rebound. Key risks include a policy mistake from Washington or the Fed, geopolitics, and a surprising pickup in inflation. Bouts of volatility are likely.
We hope for more capital investment in the second half of 2016 and beyond.
MIDYEAR OUTLOOK 2016: CAMPAIGNING FOR MORE INVESTMENT
This week’s commentary features content from LPL Research’s Midyear Outlook 2016: A Vote of Confidence, published on July 12, 2016.
We continue to expect mid-single-digit returns for the S&P 500 in 2016, consistent with historical mid-to-late economic cycle performance. As discussed in our just released Midyear Outlook 2016: A Vote Of Confidence, we expect those modest second half gains to be derived from mid- to high-single-digit earnings growth over the second half of 2016, supported by steady U.S. economic growth and stability in oil prices and the U.S. dollar. A slight increase in price-to- earnings ratios (PE) above 16.6 is possible as market participants gain greater clarity on the U.S. election and the U.K.’s relationship with Europe, and begin to price in earnings growth in 2017. Low interest rates continue to provide support for stock valuations. Key risks include a policy mistake from Washington or the Federal Reserve (Fed), geopolitics including political uncertainty in Europe, and a surprising pickup in inflation that leaves the Fed playing catch-up. We expect to experience more bouts of volatility given these risks and the age business cycle.
THE ROAD TO A BETTER TOMORROW THROUGH CORPORATE AMERICA
Is corporate America investing enough in its future? A popular worry on Wall Street — and even on Main Street out on the campaign trail — is that companies are returning too much cash to shareholders and not investing enough in future growth in the form of capital expenditures (or capex). The current economic expansion, with a 2% average growth rate since the end of the Great Recession, has been sub-par. That slow growth has coincided with below-average growth of capex. But has corporate America been underinvesting? We would say yes, but the level of investment may be appropriate for an economy exhibiting slow growth. It does not appear that capex dollars are being crowded out by other competing capital allocation decisions, and the energy downturn is a big part of the weak investment story.
Figure 1 shows that our proxy for capex (nonresidential fixed investment) remains at the high end of its historical range relative to the size of the U.S. economy. By this measure, companies are investing in property, plant, equipment, and intellectual property at an even higher rate, relative to the size of the economy, than they have historically. When considering the more than 30% reduction in energy capex since oil peaked in June 2014, the level of capex looks much better. This suggests that the level of investment may be on target given the level of economic activity. That’s not great news, but it suggests that if economic growth picks up and the energy recovery continues, as we expect, capex would turn higher.
There are four primary potential destinations for companies’ excess capital:
▪ Share repurchases. We do not believe that companies’ desire to return more capital to shareholders through share repurchases is much of an impediment to capex. In dollar terms, share repurchases for S&P 500 companies are near record highs, with $572 billion returned to shareholders in 2015. But when measured against market capitalization to create a repurchase yield, share repurchases are below the 10-year average (3.0% versus 3.2%).
▪ Dividends. The total dollar amount the S&P 500 paid out in dividends in 2015 of $385 billion was an all-time high and 2016 is shaping up to be another record year. But the dividend yield on the S&P 500 — the size of that dividend pie relative to the total market capitalization of the index stands at 2.1%, in-line with the 10-year average and well below the 50-year average of 3.0%. Looking at dividends another way, companies are paying out a slightly smaller portion of earnings than they have historically, suggesting dividends are not crowding out investment.
▪ Mergers. Buyers globally announced approximately $4.0 trillion in mergers and acquisitions in 2015, surpassing 2007 for the most on record. The environment in the U.S. remains ripe for mergers over the rest of 2016 and into 2017 with modest economic and earnings growth, low interest rates, and generally favorable credit conditions, although Brexit and U.S. election uncertainty remain wild cards.
▪ Debt repayment. Debt repayment was a popular destination for excess capital immediately after the financial crisis, as companies shored up weakened balance sheets and took advantage of lower interest rates to refinance existing debt and extend maturities. With those maturities extended at low borrowing rates, debt repayment is much less impactful.
We are hoping for more capital investment in the second half of 2016 and beyond, supported by these four factors:
▪ Stronger economic growth. More growth would lead to greater use of the economy’s excess capacity, which would eventually spark more capital investment. Fiscal policy may provide a boost in 2017 as both presidential candidates favor increased infrastructure spending, although protectionist trade policies and Brexit-related uncertainty could work in the opposite direction.
▪ An earnings rebound. We do expect a solid rebound in S&P 500 earnings in the second half of the year even in the event of potential modest upward pressure on the U.S. dollar. More earnings would mean companies have more to invest.
▪ Favorable credit conditions. Credit conditions remain generally favorable with low interest rates, strong corporate balance sheets, manageable debt service costs, and generally receptive markets for debt offerings. In general, we expect these conditions to remain favorable, although we are watching developments in Europe closely.
▪ More confidence. The lackluster economic recovery has left some CEOs lacking the confidence to invest. U.S. elections will likely bring greater policy clarity — we have very little now — and hopefully increase corporate confidence. Prospects for a relatively smooth transition for the U.K. out of the EU would also help.
THERE IS HOPE FOR EARNINGS
We continue to believe the conditions are in place for a solid rebound in corporate profits during the second half of 2016. After a slow start to the year, we expect 2–2.5% economic growth in the second half, as measured by gross domestic product (GDP). Nominal economic growth, which includes inflation and may exceed 4% during the second half, is highly correlated to corporate revenue. S&P 500 revenue is expected to rise 3.6% in the second half based on consensus estimates. The recent improvement in the Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) for manufacturing, which has shown high correlation to corporate profits historically, is encouraging.
Drags from U.S. Dollar & Oil Should Ease
The U.S. dollar, should it remain near current levels, would be a potential tailwind for earnings in the third and fourth quarters of 2016, after representing as much as a 20% drag on foreign earnings in the second quarter of 2015 [Figure 2]. We do not expect a prolonged U.S. dollar rally as a result of Brexit, but that remains a risk to earnings in the coming months.
Should oil prices stay at current levels, the commodity would show year-over-year price gains in the third quarter of 2016 [Figure 3]; this, along with the significant capital spending and other cost reductions undertaken by oil and gas producers, could potentially enable the energy sector to reach consensus double-digit earnings gains by year-end and propel overall S&P 500 profit margins back to near record highs. A potential Brexit-driven rally in the U.S. dollar that drags oil prices lower is a risk.
Wages Remain in Check
Finally, although wage pressures are starting to build, and wages are the biggest component of companies’ cost structure, increases have been gradual. Wage inflation remains below levels of prior decades based on the government’s Employment Cost Index (ECI) for wages. The most recent ECI reading in the first quarter of 2016 increased 2.1% year over year (on an inflation- adjusted basis), compared to the 30-average of 3.0%. In the June payroll survey (released July 8), average hourly earnings rose 2.6%. So far, excluding the energy sector, S&P 500 companies have done an excellent job of absorbing wage increases over the past two years. As long as wage gains remain gradual, we do not see them as a material threat to corporate earnings.
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful. Investing in stock includes numerous specific risks including: the fluctuation of dividend, loss of principal, and potential liquidity of the investment in a falling market. All investing involves risk including loss of principal. Investing in MLPs involves additional risks as compared with the risks of investing in common stock, including risks related to cash flow, dilution, and voting rights. MLPs may trade less frequently than larger companies due to their smaller capitalizations, which may result in erratic price movement or difficulty in buying or selling. MLPs are subject to significant regulation and may be adversely affected by changes in the regulatory environment, including the risk that an MLP could lose its tax status as a partnership. Additional management fees and other expenses are associated with investing in MLPs. Commodity-linked investments may be more volatile and less liquid than the underlying instruments or measures, and their value may be affected by the performance of the overall commodities baskets, as well as weather, geopolitical events, and regulatory developments. Currency risk arises from the change in price of one currency against another. Whenever investors or companies have assets or business operations across national borders, they face currency risk if their positions are not hedged. Because of its narrow focus, investing in a single sector, such as energy or manufacturing, will be subject to greater volatility than investing more broadly across many sectors and companies.
INDEX DESCRIPTIONS The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Index is based on surveys of more than 300 manufacturing firms by the Institute of Supply Management. The ISM Manufacturing Index monitors employment, production inventories, new orders, and supplier deliveries. A composite diffusion index is created that monitors conditions in national manufacturing based on the data from these surveys. The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) Employment Cost Index (ECI) is a quarterly release which gives information on the costs of labor for businesses in the United States.